Campaign Vision
I view our campaign as one of defending and strengthening rural Iowa, of keeping our people and our wealth here by bolstering the necessary social supports and frameworks our people need to stay. We’ve been hit by decades of population decline, which is impairing the quality of life of our people who are still here. Our young people are being driven away by the lack of opportunity and stability in our district. The problems driving our people away are being amplified by those currently in power who benefit from this hollowing out. Family bonds are being weakened as a result. We don’t have the expertise we need at critical juncture points in our communities to give our people the quality of life they deserve. It's time to push back on this hollowing out of our district.
Health Care as a Human Right
We are one of the only industrialized nations without guaranteed, universal health care. Our rural hospitals are at risk of closure, many people are saddled with crippling medical debt, and high prescription drug prices leave many unable to afford the medication they rely on. Across the country and in Iowa, the right to access safe and legal abortions is under attack, and my opponent has pushed for a national abortion ban. This not only puts women at extreme risk but exacerbates the issue of limited access to medical care already present in rural Iowa, as we already have many counties in our district and state without a single OB-GYN, driving increases in maternal mortality rate.
-
With Medicare for All, healthcare would no longer be tied to your job, and individuals would not be limited to “in-network” treatment and doctors.
Coverage would include primary care, vision, dental, prescription drugs, mental health, substance abuse, long-term services and supports, reproductive healthcare, and more.
There would be no premiums, deductibles, or copays, and no more medical debt. Numerous assessments have found that a Medicare for All style plan would be more economical, costing us less overall than our current privatized healthcare system.
-
A Medicare for All system would bolster the financial sustainability of rural hospitals. With this system, as people who are newly insured began to access care at higher rates, hospital use would expand and increase the availability of doctors and hospitals overall.
-
With a Medicare for All framework, Medicare would be able to negotiate prescription drug prices, reducing the ability of “Big Pharma” to price-gouge American citizens.
-
According to the 2023 “Cancer in Iowa” report, statistics reveal that Iowa has the second-highest cancer incidence rate in the nation, and is the only state with a rising rate of cancer. High rates of cancer can be seen across every major cancer type. While there is not one single reason why this is occurring, identifying risk factors for Iowans can lower their risk of cancer. It’s hard to make progress on these fronts when our elected officials are too afraid to dig into the root causes, which is the status quo. A Medicare for All system would increase an Iowan’s ability to have regular visits with their doctor and identify issues early on, improving health outcomes.
-
The government should not be interfering in extremely personal and private medical and family planning choices. I support both H.R. 3755 Women’s Health Protection Act and H.R. 8373 Right to Contraception Act which protects the rights to abortion and contraceptive access, and providers’ abilities to provide both.
-
Rural Iowa has long faced a lack of mental health and addiction treatment services. Under Medicare for All, mental health and substance abuse treatment would be covered for all.
-
While we are working towards Medicare for All, we need to continue to strengthen the Affordable Care Act. While the act has benefited many, there are still burdensome deductibles and other concerns we need to prioritize.
Advocate for At-Risk Communities
Many in positions of power are increasingly emphasizing social wedge issues that distract from what we really should be trying to accomplish, and often the most at-risk communities bear the brunt. We are seeing increasing violence, discriminatory actions, violent rhetoric, and attacks on the rights of women, the LGBTQ+ community, and People of Color. Additionally, we have long failed our military veterans when it comes to healthcare, housing access, and other needs.
-
While my opponent routinely votes against measures that make veterans’ benefits easier to access, I will fight to ensure bureaucratic hurdles and red tape are removed for those who have served our country.
The PACT Act is one such example of needed legislation in this context that was recently passed (that my opponent Randy Feenstra voted against the first time before relenting to public pressure and voting for it the second time), but there are still major concerns regarding homelessness, mental illness, substance abuse, and the lack of knowledge of benefits veterans are eligible for that we still need to address.
We also need to continue to bolster our VA system and support our county veterans benefits coordinators in their efforts to alert veterans to the benefits they are eligible for.
-
There is no reason the government should interfere in two individuals’ ability to marry who they love.
I happily support H.R. 8404 Respect for Marriage Act, which enshrined the right of same-sex and interracial couples to marry into federal law (a bill my opponent voted against).
Additionally, I support the Equality Act, which prohibits discrimination on sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity. This is of particular importance given the increasing attacks against the Trans community.
-
We have seen a ramp-up in efforts to suppress the voting power of People of Color across the country. I would support efforts to restore the Voting Rights Act components that SCOTUS has gutted, to prevent such voter suppression, and would support the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.
I am an environmental justice advocate and recognize that much of the pollution in our waterways, soil, and air disproportionately affects People of Color. As we fight for climate action, we must identify equitable solutions.
There is a troubling disparity in maternal mortality rates among People of Color. I support Medicare for All, which would provide lifelong coverage for all necessary health services, including primary care, contraception, pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum care, and mental health.
We must also address the fact that black and brown Americans find it much harder to access banking services, get loan approvals, and face predatory lending consequences.
There are clear racial discrepancies and disparities when it comes to policing. Black and brown Americans are more likely to get arrested for the same actions as white Americans and are more likely to face violence when being apprehended. It is unacceptable that those in law enforcement responsible for acts of police brutality find it easy to slip into a different police department to avoid accountability. I would advocate for a federal database of such actions to prevent this.
-
I think it’s shameful that in 2023, equal rights for women are not encoded in the Constitution. As such, I’m in favor of the Equal Rights Amendment. I’m also an advocate for women in the workplace and will do my part to address the gender pay gap. I will also work to fund domestic violence prevention programs such as the Violence Against Women Act, an act my opponent Randy Feenstra voted against. I’m also pro-choice, a firm believer in reproductive rights, and will do my part to Codify Roe.
-
We are a nation of immigrants, but far too many of our politicians have forgotten this. Instead, they fearmonger, lying about the threat that immigrants pose to our communities. Reams of data show that both legal and undocumented immigrants here commit crime at much lower rates than native-born citizens. So many of our communities in the 4th congressional district have also seen an injection of new life and energy due to immigrants. Instead of rolling back decades of child labor law in an attempt to fill labor shortages like the Iowa state legislature did recently that puts our kids at risk of injury, I advocate instead for the creation of a robust immigrant labor program, relying on state and federal coordination so border state governors can send migrants to areas like our congressional district to find work instead of dumping them on random cities by surprise to play political games. We also need more funding for asylum judges and our immigration system to alleviate the backlog of asylum and legal immigration applicants. We also need to work with the governments of nations the migration flows are coming from to help where we can in alleviating the root causes of the migration flows in the first place, and to work with nations along the route to house and assimilate more migrants. I also think we should work with our allies across the world who are struggling to find labor to ask them to absorb some of these immigration flows as well. Immigrants deserve to be treated humanely, with respect. We would need to make sure that if such a robust immigrant labor program were implemented that migrant workers would be treated fairly in pay and benefit without being victims of exploitatoin. We need more robust coordination efforts between the actors listed above to ensure the dignity of immigrants is respected, while also ensuring our communities are best equipped to take them in.
Public Safety & Criminal Justice Reform
Iowans deserve to feel safe in their homes, schools, workplaces, and public spaces. With the uniquely American threat of gun violence and mass incarceration, there are many areas we need reform.
-
Red Flag Laws: It is shameful that regardless of the number of mass shooting events we’ve seen nationally, the needle hasn’t sufficiently moved legislatively to better protect our people. My opponent, Randy Feenstra, has an A+ rating from the NRA and has taken a lot of their money. His inaction reflects this. There are a number of things I support in this regard to make our communities safer. First, I’m a believer in red flag laws, to give communities a mechanism through which they can initiate a process that leads to disarming someone that is a clear threat to the community. I know though that such laws are only as good as the authorities who implement them, so we’d need to be mindful here about how we write the law to ensure it best protects communities. I also am a believer in due process and am wary of government overreach, so the law would need to be mindful of that as well.
An Assault Weapons Ban and National Buyback Program: It is unacceptable that one person with an AR-15 can fend off an entire police department or drive a whole community to have to go on lock down, or kill so many so quickly. These weapons of war do not belong on our streets. I am in support of an Assault Weapons Ban. The last time period one was in place here, we did see a reduction in mass shootings. The masa shooting epidemic is truly an American one, as countries around the world have figured this out. We can too. To facilitate this, I would be in support of a national gun buyback program.
Universal Background Checks: It is unconscionable to me that so many can purchase firearms that have flags in their history that should prevent them from being able to purchase them. Yet, there are far too many loopholes in our current system, and this is posing a significant threat to public safety. I’m a believer in universal background checks for every gun purchase.
State Law Variation: One major issue regarding gun violence is that much of the legislation to curb it is an inconsistent patchwork of state legislation that still leaves citizens of states with more robust gun safety laws vulnerable. For example, in Illinois, much of the gun violence there is driven by guns brought in from other states with more lax gun safety laws. There needs to be more federal action to protect citizens.
Campaign Finance Reform: One of the main reasons that the mass murder of children has not moved the needle on gun safety in our country is because of our campaign finance laws that allow lobbying groups like the NRA to buy members of Congress. It is unacceptable that polling shows the vast majority of U.S. citizens support more robust gun safety legislation but can’t get it. We need to push back against the consequences we’ve seen from SCOTUS’ Citizens United decision and put legislative power back in the hands of the people.
Gun ID: We need to move toward a status quo where each gun purchased needs to have a unique identifier or connection to its buyer to better track illegal gun sales.
Safe storage laws: We read every week of another horrific accidental gun injury or death at home when a child gets their hands on a gun that should have been safely secured but wasn’t. We don’t have sufficient federal legislation to address this problem.
-
It is absolutely illogical that alcohol is legal but marijuana is not, especially considering the many medical benefits that arise from its use. Marijuana criminalization was based in part on racial harassment of minorities and has suppressed the ability of far too many People of Color to have the lives they deserve. Additionally, study after study shows white Americans and People of Color use marijuana at similar rates, yet People of Color face a much higher rate of legal consequence. We need to legalize marijuana to end this illogical injustice.
-
We incarcerate more of our own citizens than all nations other than China. Many of our laws were written to bolster the private prison industry, so we first need to end private prisons. There should be no financial incentive to imprison people. That’s absolutely immoral. We also need to shift the War on Drugs that puts so many non-violent offenders in prison to a focus on treatment and recovery, along with getting to the true root of drug addiction, much of which is driven by economic despair.
-
We need a shift in our policing mentality from one of broken windows policing to one of community policing. Our police departments should have the same demographic makeup as the communities they are policing. We need our police to not be militarized entities. We must establish independent review boards to investigate incidents of police brutality, removing the bias from such investigations. If a police officer is found guilty or liable for excessive use of force, it should not be nearly as easy for them to leave one police department and go to another. Additionally, we need to stop putting police officers in positions they shouldn’t be asked to handle, as they are often not best equipped to handle mental health crises. Instead, whether it be as part of police department budgets or otherwise, we need more funding for mental health professionals so we can better de-escalate these situations and have experts making the decisions in pursuing red flag law enactment. Finally, federal investigations have found a number of police departments are not doing their part to root out racial discrimination from their ranks. It shouldn’t take a notable incident of excessive use of police force to initiate such an investigation. There should be protocols in place to audit these concerns proactively.